This Paper Or Essay Is About Myself. What I Would Want People To Know

This paper or essay is about myself. What i would want people to know about me, Christopher. Well let me start off by saying that i'm a pretty nice fellow. Maybe not all the time but mostly. I have alot of friends, some i have'nttalked to in months. I'm like that sometimes though. That's one thing i noticed about myself, that i get tired of people after a certain amount of time.I'm not really sure if that is because that particular person is just annoying or if i'm like my mother to a certain extent and just don't like people. That can't be it though. She's a little to much like a Hermit. There's days when i am a Social Butterfly. Talking to anybody and everybody. Even people i dislike on a regular basis. These are the days when i feel completely invincible. Like no one can withstand my sort of prowlness for a conversation. It's like everyone i see, I see as a close friend or someone who needs someone to talk to.Everything seems funny, like in a comical sort of way. These are the really cool days. Then of coarse theres the other days. The days when everyone seems to be playing double-dutch with my last nerve. These are the days when the slightest imperfection can send me into a wrath that can make me new enemies. These are ythe days when i don't want to do anything. I just want to be left alone. Don't call me, write me or speak my name. That's the way i feel.These days suck. Even when i try to cheer my self up, i seem to get more pissed off. This i know i get from my mother. All in all though i am a pretty cheerful guy. I enjoy life. I believe life is what you make it. All i try to do is make each day count as if it's my last.

Godwins Law

Godwins Law Godwin’s Law Godwin’s Law By Maeve Maddox Mike Godwin is an American attorney and author who formulated â€Å"Godwin’s Law† in 1990 when he made the following assertion: As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1. Note: In probability theory, an event is said to never happen when its probability is 0, and to always happen when its probability is 1. Godwin’s Law, also known as â€Å"Godwin’s Law of Nazi Analogies,† is applicable to threaded online discussions in forums, chat rooms, and on blogs. The term has earned a place in the OED: Godwin’s Law: noun. A facetious aphorism maintaining that as an online debate increases in length, it becomes inevitable that someone will eventually compare someone or something to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis. Although coined to describe an Internet phenomenon, the term is being applied to the use of â€Å"the Nazi card† in other contexts, as in this account of Ted Cruz’s filibuster to delay a vote on the Affordable Care Act: In the course of the afternoon wegot some Nazi analogies, just proving that Godwin’s Law holds for filibusters as for online discussion. and in this blog: And it’s not only online discussions that prove Godwin’s Law, I remember sitting at lunch with a construction crew when one of the carpenters brought up my work in the pro-life movement: â€Å"Yep, tea-baggers are always telling people how to live, just like the Nazis.† Clashdaily A complaint by many forum users is that the so-called law is stifling discussion. One commenter invokes a Nazi analogy and another crows, â€Å"You said Hitler, so I win!† At that point, the discussion ends. The term has spawned a verb, â€Å"to Godwin,† as in, â€Å"You Godwined this discussion!† The invocation of Godwin’s Law has come to be seen as a way to end an online discussion. Here are some complaints voiced by forum users: It seems like Godwins law is becoming a real problem for any sort of discussion on the internet. Whenever Hitler, Nazis, or the Holocaust are brought up in a discussion, the discussion is then over and the poster who mentioned the subject is derided. This wouldnt be a problem if it was just people injecting these things into seemingly unrelated topics, but people invoke Godwins law even when the Hitler/Nazi/Holocaust mention is relevant to the topic at hand. forum user Before I get started Im aware that originally â€Å"Godwins Law† didnt carry the now common meaning of You said Hitler, So I Win! that so many people seem to think it means. forum user Nazism is a cultural meme that encapsulates not just the notion of political authoritarianism, but of the worst possible human behavior towards other human beings. Note: In a theory of mental content called memetics, a meme is analogous to a gene in the theory of evolution. A meme represents a unit of culture (idea, belief, pattern of behavior) that travels from mind to mind. Perhaps Nazi analogies are best reserved for discussions of the dehumanization and inhumane treatment of large numbers of human beings. If the intention is to compare one form of authoritarianism to another, without the connotation of racism or genocide, perhaps one of the following word choices would meet the need: fascism: any form of right-wing authoritarianism. totalitarianism: Totalitarian theory and practice; the advocacy of totalitarian government. Also loosely, authoritarianism dictatorship: A system of government by the absolute rule of a single individual; despotism: The rule of a despot; despotic government; the exercise of absolute authority. autocracy: (A system of) government by one person with absolute power; a state, society, etc. governed in this way. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Incorrect Pronunciations That You Should Avoid"Latter," not "Ladder"20 Ways to Laugh

Summary and Personal Response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Summary and Personal Response - Assignment Example The campaign slogan has not however passed the critics. Some term it as a nonsensical message that has got nothing to do with the safety of the people. For example, Harvey Molotch, NYU Sociologist, has different views about the campaign slogan, â€Å"See Something, Say Something†. According to Harvey, over 2000 residents of New York had actually â€Å"seen something and said something† but nothing tangible had come out of it. He recalls that in 2006 and 2007, over eighteen terrorism related cases were â€Å"seen† and reported. However, it turned out that the reported incidents had nothing to do with terrorism. They were just normal criminal activities such as violations of immigration rules, possession of unregistered guns, and selling of fake commodities. Harvey goes further to state that â€Å"it is not easy to stop terrorism related activities just by using campaign slogans†. Nonetheless, it is unfair to say that reporting does not help at all. A street vendor who alerted the police was able to save Times Square bombing in 2010. The fact that many people in New York are busy doing their own activities is also an impediment in doing what the program advocates. The fact that there are people working on projects that involves wires and gadgets, and the Muslims carrying some machines into their worship places is also another challenge to the â€Å"See Something, Say Something† program. Reporting such harmless incidents will not only charm the law-enforcement system, but also create unnecessary tension. At times, â€Å"see something, say something† can be a nuisance slogan, especially when people report incidents that they are not sure of without involving investigators. The continual reporting of such incidences will also give police officers or investigators hard time to figure out what exactly is needed. â€Å"See something, report something† program also has a â€Å"Chicken Little† upshot. For instance, if New